Skip navigation
Paul Bohman Fine Art and Photography, Northern Utah and Washington DC
  • Home
  • Photography
    • People:
    •    Portraits & Headshots
    •    Weddings and Events- Wedding and event photography
    •    Fashion
    •    Dance
    • Places:
    •    Landscapes
    •    Cityscapes
    •    Architecture & Interior Design
  • Blog/Recent Work
  • About
  • Contact  703.930.8500
Home → Blog

Paul Bohman – Blog – Washington DC Photographer

« Viewing Rosslyn from atop the stairs in Georgetown
The New Nikon D800E »

Using my Contax 645 and Portra 800 film at a corporate event

I took my Contax 645 film camera to a recent corporate event photography assignment. I wasn’t planning on using it much, but I wanted to get a little more practice using the camera in dark indoor lighting. (I do my corporate event photography in Washington DC through my other brand, White Ribbon Studios.)

Wine bottles at a corporate event
pouring wine a candle and flowers

Normally when I shoot events in dark places (and most corporate event photography tends to be in dark places), I use my Nikon cameras with on-camera flash, which I bounce off of walls and ceilings. I never shoot with direct flash, unless there is literally nothing to bounce the flash off of, such as outdoors in open spaces in the dark of night. The Nikon cameras perform admirably, and I don’t have any complaints about them. But I’m an experimenter, so I wanted to find out what my Contax 645 was capable of.

One complication is that I don’t yet have a flash for my Contax. I knew that the camera was capable of firing my Nikon SB800 flash, even though the TTL (through-the-lens) pre-flash metering won’t work with the Contax, because the TTL feature is a Nikon proprietary technology. I had read that I could use the flash on the "automatic" setting, so I set the mode to "A" and set the focal length selector on the flash to 85mm, since I was using an 80mm lens on the Contax (that’s the closest setting that the SB800 allows), and I set the ISO to 800, because I would be using Kodak Portra 800 film. That sounds like what I’m supposed to do, right? I loaded the film and I was set to go, or so I thought.

Things started badly. I arrived early enough to do a few test shots before the event began. I took out my Contax and tried to take some photos of the decor. I focused and press the shutter button, but nothing happened. The shutter didn’t trip. What’s going on? I tried turning the camera off then back on. I tried switching buttons. After about a minute of fiddling with the camera settings, I had to put the camera back down because people were arriving, and I didn’t have time to continue troubleshooting.

Later in the evening, after I had taken plenty of photos, I went over to my Contax to see if I could figure out what went wrong earlier in the evening. It took me only a second to realize that I still had the dark slide in place, covering the opening to the film. Grrr. That was an easy, if embarrassing, fix. I didn’t spend time wallowing in my embarrassment though. For one thing, I was the only one that knew, and there was no need to tell anyone else. I took out the dark slide and I started to take a few photos of the scene.

A man watches as wine is poured at a corporate event

One of the great things about the Contax camera is its fast lenses. The 80mm f2.0 lens, in particular, allows for low light photography at a level that no other medium format system can match. The lens still isn’t as fast as a Nikon f1.4 prime, though, and you can see in the imprint on the side of the negatives that I was often shooting at 1/15th of a second in order to get the ambient light to register appropriately. That’s a very slow shutter speed for handheld photography. The photos turned out alright, I think, considering that limitation.

One thing that is definitely NOT fast about the Contax is its focusing system. It performs adequately in good lighting, but it has a really hard time performing in low light. In fact, in many corners of this room, I could not get the camera to focus at all. It just wouldn’t do it. I gave up trying, and focused instead on scenes that had enough ambient light to allow the autofocus system to work. At this point I already had plenty of photos of the event itself, so this was my own time to play around a bit.

Bottles of wine at a corporate event

Bottles of wine at a corporate event

When the lens is set to f2.0, it’s about equivalent to a 50mm f1.2 lens on a 35mm camera. It allows the background to fade into really beautiful abstract blurs and blobs of light, as you can see from this set of photos.

Wine glasses at a corporate event

A candle and some flowers on a table at a corporate event

One thing that I didn’t discover until getting the negatives back is that the flash seems to have failed to fire on about half of the photos. I’m not sure why. It may be because the Nikon SB800 flash was set to automatically go into sleep mode after a certain amount of time. That’s something I’ll have to investigate. I’m not convinced that’s the problem, because I think it would have affected even more of the photos if that were the case, but I can’t rule it out yet. When the flash did fire, it seemed to produce good, accurate exposures. I was bouncing the flash, and it still seems to have metered adequately.

[EDIT: I did some testing, and yes, the auto standby was the culprit. I'll have to disable that feature in the future when using the flash on non-Nikon cameras.]

Most of the photos that I took in which the flash didn’t fire are too dark to be usable. Film seems to have some rather dramatic and unpleasant color shifts when it is not exposed correctly — particularly when it is underexposed — and it’s really hard to correct those color shifts in post production. Here is the only usable under-exposed photo that I took:

Bottles of wine and a candle

The rest of the underexposed pictures (when the flash didn’t fire) look like mush, both in terms of the color and in terms of the motion blur, because the shutter speed was so low.

So what have I learned?

  1. Portra 800 takes excellent low light shots indoors when it is supplemented with on-camera flash. The colors are beautiful and natural, and the grain is not too noticeable.
  2. Without a flash, Portra 800 isn’t fast enough, and underexposed Portra doesn’t look very good… or at least I wasn’t able to make it look that good. I scanned the negatives and did the color adjustments myself.
  3. The Contax 645 does a horrible job of focusing in low light. Manual focusing is the only option in these circumstances.
  4. I probably need to buy a flash that’s made for the Contax camera, or else find out why my Nikon flashes weren’t firing reliably. [EDIT: The reason the flash wasn't firing was because it was set to auto standby. I still think I'm going to get a dedicated Contax flash though.]
  5. Shooting film in these situations isn’t as hopeless as I thought it might be, but…
  6. … I’m not giving up my Nikons any time soon. They’re faster and easier in low light situations, and they produce beautiful results.

Below are a few of the shots from my Nikon camera (D7000), set to ISO 2500 most of the time. A few of the shots from my Nikon also turned out underexposed, but I was able to make them look decent in all cases. Digital captures don’t suffer from color shifts in quite the same way that film does when underexposed. The underexposed digital captures still end up looking noisy, and the colors have a much narrower gamut, but they don’t start to turn cyan or other weird colors the way that color film does.

flowers on a table

Two women at a corporate event

Two men at a corporate event

A man gives a presentation at a corporate event

Three women at a corporate event

And for those of you looking for a corporate event photographer in Washington DC, I would love to do that for you! I do my event photography through my other brand, White Ribbon Studios.

About the Author

Paul Bohman is a fine art, commercial and editorial photographer in the Washington DC metro area, available for assignments worldwide.

This entry was posted on Monday, February 6th, 2012 at 1:00 am and is filed under Event photography, Film Photography, For Photographers, Photo Gear. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kdghantous Karim D. Ghantous

    I’m surprised that you couldn’t get Portra 800 to look good underexposed. Portra 400 does  very well at EI 1600 (no pushing). On MF, with its larger image area, it can go further. I’ve found that film seems to work better than digital when underexposing. Not always through personal experience, because I don’t shoot a lot of film these days (but that’s going to change). But I did experiment with underexposing digital cameras.

    Here is Portra 400 all the way to EI 12000:

    http://www.twinlenslife.com/2010/12/its-our-favorite-time-of-light-new.html

    Your opinion?

  • paulbohman

    Yes, I’ve seen the information on twinlenslife.com. Film doesn’t do so well underexposed though, as a general rule. My digital Nikon cameras (D7000 is my current model; still waiting on the D800E) outperform film by a large margin when underexposed. Underexposed film goes flat and loses contrast quickly. It also experiences color shifts, and many of the underexposed images from this set showed wildly different colors, but there wasn’t as much color information in the negatives anyway. The grain gets really bad really quickly too. I’m not sure how underexposed the originals were — at least by a couple of stops, if not more. It wasn’t worth it to me to try heroic efforts to rescue the images.

    BUT… film does MUCH better than digital when it comes to overexposure. It handles highlights much better, and it’s possible to retrieve details from negatives that have been overexposed by 2, 3, or 4 stops, when digital files would just be white.

    And maybe my scanner isn’t as good at retrieving details from underexposed negatives as some higher end scanners. I used an Epson V750 Pro, which can produce wonderful results when optimized and operated by a skilled technician, but it has its limitations, for sure. Maybe pulling details from underexposed negatives is somewhat beyond its capabilities.

  • paulbohman

    I should mention again that this room was VERY dark. It wasn’t just a little dark. It was candlelight dark. I’m sure Portra 800 could handle indoor shots in somewhat brighter conditions, but it’s not like night vision goggles or anything. Keep in mind that I was using ISO 2500 on my digital camera AND bounced flash. It was dark.

  • Archives...

    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
  • Categories...

    • Architectural Photography (6)
    • Cityscapes (9)
    • Dance Photography (1)
    • Engagement Photography (1)
    • Event photography (6)
    • Family Photography (2)
    • Fashion photography (10)
    • Film Photography (5)
    • Fine Art (4)
    • For Photographers (10)
    • Headshots (14)
    • Landscape Photography (16)
    • Lighting (4)
    • Maternity Photography (2)
    • Modeling Portfolio (1)
    • Newborn photography (1)
    • Photo Gear (4)
    • Portrait Photography (26)
    • Take a Shot (2)
    • Uncategorized (1)
    • Utah (9)
    • Vintage (3)
    • Washington DC (7)
    • Wedding Photography (10)
    • Wedding vendors (1)

Subscribe to Blog (RSS)

Affiliate Links
Adorama.com
Photography Gear Outlet
B&H Photography & Video
Online Outlet
All images copyright Paul Bohman. Unauthorized copying and reproduction in any format is prohibited.
Contact me regarding the availability of images for print or commercial use.

I am based in the Washington DC metro area, and I am available for worldwide travel on assignment.

Facebook | | Twitter | Blog Entries (RSS) | Call me: 703-930-8500 or Email me | Client Login

Washington DC wedding photographer; Northern Virginia wedding photographer; Washington DC portrait photographer; Northern Virginia portrait photographer; Maternity photography Washington DC; Photojournalist; Photojournalism; Maternity photography Northern Virginia; Pregnancy photography; Newborn photography; Arlington, Alexandria, McLean, Fairfax, Maryland; Washington DC event photography.